Consumer Protection Act 2019: Legal Liability for Selling Expired Products

The ₹2 Lakh Crocin Case

A customer bought Crocin from your pharmacy. It was expired. She didn't notice until after taking two tablets. Nothing happened to her health, but she filed a complaint with the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission.

The pharmacy owner thought: "No harm done, she'll get a refund, case closed."

The commission thought differently. ₹50,000 compensation for mental agony. ₹20,000 for harassment. ₹30,000 in legal costs. Total: ₹1,00,000. For a ₹35 strip of Crocin.

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 changed everything. Selling expired products isn't just bad business anymore. It's expensive legal liability.

What Changed in 2019

The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 replaced the 1986 Act with significantly stronger provisions:

Increased jurisdiction:

District Commission: Up to ₹1 crore
State Commission: ₹1-10 crore
National Commission: Above ₹10 crore

Punitive damages: Courts can now award punitive damages beyond just compensation—designed to punish and deter.

Product liability: Manufacturers, sellers, and service providers can all be held liable for defective goods.

Class action: Multiple consumers can file joint complaints—one expired product issue can become a mass complaint.

E-commerce inclusion: Online sellers explicitly covered—selling expired products online carries the same liability.

What Constitutes "Defective" Product

Under the Act, a product is defective if it:

Has manufacturing defects
Has design defects
Deviates from specifications
**Does not conform to express warranty** (including shelf life)
**Lacks adequate instructions or warnings** (including expiry dates)

An expired product automatically fails point 4. A product with unclear or missing expiry dates fails point 5. Either way, liability attaches.

The Liability Chain

Who can be held liable?

**Manufacturer:** For making the product
**Distributor:** For handling and supplying
**Retailer:** For selling to consumer
**Online marketplace:** If they claim any quality control

Joint and several liability: The consumer can sue anyone in the chain. The court can hold all parties liable, proportionally or entirely.

Practical implication: A retailer can be held fully liable for selling an expired product, even if the manufacturer was negligent in batch management or the distributor stored it improperly.

You can try to recover from the party that caused the problem, but that's a separate battle. The consumer gets paid regardless.

The Standard of Proof

In consumer cases, the burden is often on the seller to prove:

The product was not expired at time of sale
Adequate warnings were provided
Reasonable care was taken in storage and handling
The consumer was not misled

Without records:

"I don't know when this batch was received"
"I can't prove it wasn't expired"
"I have no storage temperature logs"
"I have no purchase records"

The absence of records works against you. The consumer says "it was expired," you say "it wasn't," and you can't prove your claim. You lose.

Compensation Categories

What courts award:

**Refund:** Price of the product (the obvious minimum)
**Replacement:** Cost of obtaining similar product
**Compensation for harm:** Medical costs, lost wages, etc.
**Mental agony:** Distress from consuming expired product
**Harassment:** Time and effort spent pursuing complaint
**Litigation costs:** Legal fees the consumer incurred
**Punitive damages:** Additional amount to punish the seller

The multiplier effect:

Product price: ₹35

Total award: ₹1,00,000

Multiplier: 2,857x

This is why expired product liability is existential for small retailers. The fine isn't proportional to the price—it's proportional to the harm and the negligence.

Real Cases and Lessons

Case 1: Expired biscuits (2021)

Consumer purchased biscuits from grocery store
Biscuits were 2 months past expiry
Consumer ate some before noticing
No physical harm
Award: ₹25,000 compensation + ₹5,000 costs

Lesson: "No harm" doesn't mean "no liability"

Case 2: Expired medicine (2020)

Customer bought expired antibiotic
Consumed before noticing expiry
Filed complaint within one week
Award: ₹50,000 + costs

Lesson: Medicines attract higher compensation due to health risk

Case 3: Expired baby food (2022)

Mother purchased expired formula
Noticed before feeding to infant
Filed complaint with district commission
Award: ₹75,000 (higher due to vulnerable consumer)

Lesson: Vulnerable consumers (children, elderly, pregnant women) get enhanced protection

Case 4: Multiple expired products (2021)

Consumer found 3 expired products in single shopping trip
Store argued "human error"
Award: ₹40,000 per product = ₹1,20,000 total

Lesson: Multiple violations compound, not average

The Defense Strategies (And Their Limits)

"The consumer should have checked":

Courts have consistently held that consumers have a right to trust that products on shelf are sellable. The burden is on the retailer, not the consumer.

"The distributor gave us expired stock":

Valid for recovering from distributor, but doesn't reduce your liability to consumer. You should have checked on receipt.

"It was only expired by a few days":

Expiry date is a bright line. One day past = expired. Courts don't do "a little bit expired."

"We have a return policy":

Good for goodwill, doesn't eliminate legal liability. Consumer can both get a refund AND file for compensation.

"The product didn't cause any harm":

Mental agony, harassment, and punitive damages don't require physical harm. The act of selling expired product is itself the harm.

Proactive Protection

What actually helps in court:

**Batch-level records:** Proof of when batch was received, how long it was in store
**Expiry monitoring systems:** Evidence of systematic checking
**Staff training records:** Proof that staff were trained on expiry management
**Removal protocols:** Documentation of expired stock removal
**Temperature logs:** For temperature-sensitive products
**GRN verification:** Evidence that expiry was checked on receipt

The "due diligence" defense:

If you can demonstrate that you had reasonable systems in place and the expired product was an isolated failure despite your efforts, courts may reduce (not eliminate) compensation.

"We have no system" = gross negligence = maximum compensation

"We have a system and it failed once" = possible reduction in compensation

Insurance Considerations

Does general business insurance cover consumer complaints?

Usually: No. Standard policies exclude:

Fines and penalties
Regulatory non-compliance
Known risks (expired product is a known risk)

Product liability insurance:

Available but expensive
May cover consumer complaint costs
Often has exclusions for "known defects" (expired = known)
Premium increases after claims

The practical reality:

Most small retailers are uninsured for consumer complaints. The ₹1 lakh award comes from personal/business funds.

The Digital Evidence Problem

Modern consumers photograph everything:

Product with expiry date visible
Store name and billing
Timestamp on photo

You can't argue with photo evidence showing:

Your store name
The product
A clearly expired date
A timestamp proving purchase date

This makes defense harder and settlements more likely.

Settlement Strategy

When to settle:

Consumer has clear evidence
Expired product is undeniable
Going to commission will add costs and publicity
Quick settlement preserves relationship

Settlement considerations:

Consumer forums often encourage mediation
Settlement can include non-disclosure
Settlement amount typically lower than commission award
Avoid admission of liability in settlement language

When to contest:

Consumer's evidence is weak
Product wasn't actually expired (date confusion)
Consumer is making exaggerated claims
Principle matters more than cost

Compliance Program Essentials

To minimize legal exposure:

**Inventory tracking:** Batch-level, with expiry dates
**Automated alerts:** Before products expire
**Staff protocols:** Clear rules on checking and removing
**Receipt verification:** Don't accept near-expiry stock
**Regular audits:** Check actual shelf vs. records
**Documentation:** Keep records for at least 3 years
**Customer handling:** Immediate, graceful resolution of complaints

The cost-benefit:

Compliance system cost: ₹3,000-10,000/month
One consumer case cost: ₹50,000-2,00,000+

The math is obvious. Prevention is dramatically cheaper than defense.

The Bottom Line

Under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, selling expired products is legal liability waiting to happen. The awards are disproportionate to product value, punitive damages exist, and the burden of proof favors consumers.

Your defense isn't arguing in commission. Your defense is having systems that prevent expired products from reaching shelves—and records to prove those systems exist.

Every expired product on your shelf is a potential ₹1 lakh liability. That's not an exaggeration. That's the law.

---

*Want to prevent expired products from reaching customers—and have the records to prove your compliance? ShelfLifePro tracks every batch from receipt to sale. [See how it works →](/retail)*